Peptides.info
← News
Clinical researchDeveloping

Novo: 23 of 26 semaglutide 7.2 mg participants with excess liver fat reached normal levels – in a post hoc analysis of 55 people

Novo Nordisk's October 1, 2026 release, tied to a presentation at EASD 2026, reports a liver-fat sub-analysis of the STEP UP trials. The company itself labels it post hoc and exploratory.

Published October 5, 2026 · Twenty Residues editorial

In the catalogSemaglutide

What the record establishes

  • STEP UP and STEP UP T2D were Phase 3b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials; the pooled analysis covers 1,919 adults (semaglutide 7.2 mg n=1,312, 2.4 mg n=304, placebo n=303).
  • The liver-fat sub-analysis included 55 participants with excess liver fat. Of 26 with baseline liver fat above 5%, 23 (88.5%) were below 5% at week 72; mean liver fat fell from 8.8% to 3.1%.
  • Novo states the analysis was post hoc and exploratory and not a pre-specified primary or secondary endpoint of the parent trials. It was presented at EASD 2026 in Milan on October 1, 2026.
  • The release gives no adverse-event data and does not report which dose arm the 26 participants were in.

What it does not establish

  • A company release is the sponsor's summary. The analysis is not peer-reviewed and the underlying data are not public.
  • Twenty-six participants cannot establish how often semaglutide normalizes liver fat. The headline '9 out of 10' rests on that small base.
  • Liver fat on imaging is not liver outcomes. The release does not report fibrosis change, liver events, or longer-term follow-up, and fewer than 1% of participants met advanced-fibrosis criteria.
  • Nothing here applies to compounded or research-use semaglutide, whose contents and dose are outside the trial.

What would change this

A peer-reviewed publication or poster with dose-arm breakdown and confidence intervals, or a pre-specified liver endpoint from a dedicated trial.

The open question

If a small post hoc subgroup is the only place a liver signal appears, is it a hypothesis worth chasing or a result that was found because someone went looking?

We don't answer this one. Take it to wherever you argue about peptides, and send us the strongest case from either side.

Propose a question by emailor on the public record

Sources

  1. [1]

Related